ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Artificial intelligence in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: A scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning-Based Tracking of Neurovascular Features Toward Semi-Automated Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks by Non-Specialists.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Current Status and Future Projections of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Ultrasonography and Needle Visibility Methods in Regional Anesthesia.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2026Article
- The evolution and future of point of care ultrasound in the perioperative period: narrative review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- AI applications across the cancer pain care Continuum: applications and future directions.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided cellular therapy: Current applications and future directions in skeletal muscle regeneration.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Percutaneous core needle biopsy guided by ultrasound: a narrative review.Journal of ultrasound · 2025Review
- Global trends in artificial intelligence research in anesthesia from 2000 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Exploring the growth and impact of artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: a bibliometric study from 2004 to 2024.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: a bibliometric analysis.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2024Review
- Current evidence on artificial intelligence in regional anesthesia.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Review
- Optimising artificial intelligence ultrasound tools in anaesthesiology and perioperative medicine: The next frontier for advanced technology application.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia: An explorative scoping review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Supported Ultrasonography in Anesthesiology: Evaluation of a Patient in the Operating Theatre.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Regional anesthesia is increasingly used in acute postoperative pain management. Ultrasound has been used to facilitate the performance of the regional block, increase the percentage of successfully performed procedures and reduce the complication rate. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been studied in many medical disciplines with achieving high success, especially in radiology. The purpose of this review was to review the evidence on the application of artificial intelligence for optimization and interpretation of the sonographic image, and visualization of needle advancement and injection of local anesthetic. Methods: To conduct this scoping review, we followed the PRISMA-S guidelines. We included studies if they met the following criteria: (1) Application of Artificial intelligence-assisted in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia; (2) Any human subject (of any age), object (manikin), or animal; (3) Study design: prospective, retrospective, RCTs; (4) Any method of regional anesthesia (epidural, spinal anesthesia, peripheral nerves); (5) Any anatomical localization of regional anesthesia (any nerve or plexus) (6) Any methods of artificial intelligence; (7) Settings: Any healthcare settings (Medical centers, hospitals, clinics, laboratories. Results: The systematic searches identified 78 citations. After the removal of the duplicates, 19 full-text articles were assessed; and 15 studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. Conclusions: AI solutions might be useful in anatomical landmark identification, reducing or even avoiding possible complications. AI-guided solutions can improve the optimization and interpretation of the sonographic image, visualization of needle advancement, and injection of local anesthetic. AI-guided solutions might improve the training process in UGRA. Although significant progress has been made in the application of AI-guided UGRA, randomized control trials are still missing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.