ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Pharmacogenes that demonstrate high association evidence according to CPIC, DPWG, and PharmGKB.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- CYP450 Metabolizer Phenotypes in a Turkish Emergency Cardiac Patient Cohort: A Descriptive Pharmacogenomic Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Beyond the Very Important Pharmacogenes (VIPs): Uncovering Shadow Pharmacogenes in the Human Drug Response Network.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenomics of risperidone in autism spectrum disorder: a minireview.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Atorvastatin Safety Reappraised: From Pharmacogenomic Mechanisms to Personalized Risk Management.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Review
- Clinical impact of pharmacogenetic risk variants in a large chinese cohort.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The Role of Candidate Polymorphisms in Drug Transporter Genes on High-Dose Methotrexate in the Consolidation Phase of the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 Protocol.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Unveiling the heritability of selected unexplored pharmacogenetic markers in the Saudi population.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- PGxQA: A Resource for Evaluating LLM Performance for Pharmacogenomic QA Tasks.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2025Article
- Challenges and prospects in bridging precision medicine and artificial intelligence in genomic psychiatric treatment.World journal of psychiatry · 2024Review
- Pharmacogenomic profiling of the South Korean population: Insights and implications for personalized medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Article
- Influence of pharmacogenetics on the diversity of response to statins associated with adverse drug reactions.Advances in laboratory medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Different levels of evidence related to the variable responses of individuals to drug treatment have been reported in various pharmacogenomic (PGx) databases. Identification of gene-drug pairs with strong association evidence can be helpful in prioritizing the implementation of PGx guidelines and focusing on a gene panel. This study aimed to determine the pharmacogenes with the highest evidence-based association and to indicate their involvement in drug-gene interactions. Methodology: The publicly available datasets CPIC, DPWG, and PharmGKB were selected to determine the pharmacogenes with the highest drug outcome associations. The upper two levels of evidence rated by the three scoring methods were specified (levels A-B in CPIC, 3-4 in DPWG, or 1-2 levels in PharmGKB). The identified pharmacogenes were further ranked in this study based on the number of medications they interacted with. Results: Fifty pharmacogenes, with high to moderately high evidence of associations with drug response alterations, with potential influence on the therapeutic and/or toxicity outcomes of 152 drugs were identified. CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, G6PD, HLA-B, SLCO1B1, CACNA1S, RYR1, MT-RNR1, and IFNL4 are the top 10 pharmacogenes, where each is predicted to impact patients' responses to ≥5 drugs. Conclusion: This study identified the most important pharmacogenes based on the highest-ranked association evidence and their frequency of involvement in affecting multiple drugs. The obtained data is useful for customizing a gene panel for PGx testing. Identifying the strength of scientific evidence supporting drug-gene interactions aids drug prescribers in making the best clinical decision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.