Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36388869›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2022

Perceptions of two different alcohol use behaviours in pregnancy: an application of the prototype/willingness model.

Tess Fletcher, Barbara Mullan, Amy Finlay-Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tess FletcherFASD Research Australia Centre for Research Excellence, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4537-1425
Barbara MullanEnable Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0177-8899
Amy Finlay-JonesFASD Research Australia Centre for Research Excellence, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1336-4001

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study explored whether exposure to either an 'ambiguous consumption' prototype (no amount of alcohol specified) or a 'small consumption' prototype ('small' amount of alcohol specified) had an impact on prototype perceptions of, and willingness to use, small amounts of alcohol during pregnancy. Method: Participants were 140 women living in the UK, aged 20-45 years old, of whom 92% had previously been, or intended to become, pregnant. Participants completed measures to assess how favourably they viewed alcohol use in pregnancy, how similar they felt to those who would use alcohol in pregnancy and how responsible they perceived those who would use alcohol in pregnancy to be. Participant's own willingness to use small amounts of alcohol during pregnancy was also assessed. Results: Having at least one child was positively correlated with being willing to accept an alcoholic drink while pregnant for those exposed to the 'ambiguous consumption' prototype only. Although perceptions of favourability, similarity and responsibility were consistently higher for those exposed to a 'small consumption' condition, there were no differences in willingness to drink according to exposure. Conclusion: This research suggests that women's perceptions of those who drink alcohol while pregnant differ according to the amount of alcohol that they perceive as typical. This may have implications for how alcohol use in pregnancy is portrayed in public health messaging, particularly regarding the level of acceptance that may be associated with low to moderate alcohol use.

Indexed as

health behaviourpregnancyprenatal alcohol exposurePrevention

Identifiers

PMID36388869
PMCPMC9645282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.