Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36388821›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Development and validation of prediction model using nursing notes on sentiment scores for prognosis of patients with severe acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy based on computational intelligence algorithms.

Danfeng Zha, Xionghao Yang, Haifen Zhang, Li Xu, Yan Jin, Na Li, Li Yang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Danfeng Zha *Department Nephrology, Renji Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xionghao Yang *Hemodialysis Center, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Haifen ZhangHemodialysis Center, Renji Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Li XuCoronary Care Unit, Renji Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yan JinDepartment Nephrology, Renji Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Na LiDepartment Nephrology, Renji Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Li YangGeneral Surgery Department, Renji Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Renji Hospital · CNYangpu Hospital of Tongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Currently, the prediction values of models for the prognosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were ordinary and establishing a better prediction model is necessary. Nursing notes are an important predictor of in-hospital mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This study established prognostic prediction models for AKI patients receiving CRRT especially using nursing notes. Methods: Totally, 682 AKI patients undergoing CRRT were included. AKI was diagnosed based on Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Four hundred and twelve patients lacking nursing notes data were excluded. Finally, 270 patients were included and randomly divided into a training set (n=189) and a testing set (n=81) at a ratio of 7:3. Univariate analysis explored the possible predictors of mortality in AKI patients receiving CRRT. Random forest models and broad learning system (BLS) models (with or without sentiment scores) were respectively constructed in the training set and verified in the testing set. The performances of the models were assessed by the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Results: For the random forest model including the sentiment scores, the AUC was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81-0.91), the sensitivity was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63-0.80), and the specificity was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.94) in the training set and the AUC was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68-0.88), the sensitivity was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.49-0.80), and the specificity was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) in the testing set. For the BLS model including the sentiment scores, the AUC was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.92), the sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99) and the specificity was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.38-0.59) in the training set and the AUC was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73-0.91), the sensitivity was 0.41 (95% CI: 0.25-0.56) and the specificity was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93-1.00) in the testing set. Conclusions: The BLS models including the sentiment scores might offer a tool for quickly identifying patients AKI patients receiving CRRT with high risk of mortality and providing timely interventions to them for improving their prognosis.

Indexed as

acute kidney injury (AKI)continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)Nursing notesprognosissentiment scores

Identifiers

PMID36388821
PMCPMC9652558
OpenAlexW4309410676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.