Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36388794›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib for preventing tumor recurrence after liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria.

De-Zhen Guo, Jian-Wen Cheng, Jia-Yan Yan, Ao Huang, Yu-Peng Wang, Shi-Yu Zhang, Ya Cao, Xiao-Wu Huang, Jia Fan, Jian Zhou and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Chinese expert guidance on overall application of lenvatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

De-Zhen Guo *Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Jian-Wen Cheng *Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Jia-Yan YanDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Ao HuangDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Peng WangDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Shi-Yu ZhangDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Ya CaoCancer Research Institute, Central South University; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion, Ministry of Education, Changsha, China.
Xiao-Wu HuangDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Jia FanDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Jian ZhouDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Xin-Rong YangDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNFudan University · CNCentral South University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNZhongshan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lenvatinib is one of the first-line treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, data are lacking on lenvatinib in the postoperative setting. Methods: This retrospective analysis enrolled 242 patients with HCC who underwent liver transplantation (LTx). Eligible patients were divided into 2 groups according to their use of adjuvant lenvatinib following LTx (lenvatinib, n=42; control, n=200). The primary outcome measures were overall survival (OS), time to recurrence (TTR), and safety. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to calculate the OS, while a competing risk model was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of recurrence. Results: The lenvatinib group showed more advanced tumors and a higher proportion of HCC beyond the Milan criteria (P<0.001) than the control group. There were no significant differences in both the OS and TTR between the 2 groups. After focusing on the patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria, baseline characteristics were similar in the lenvatinib group (n=38) and the control group (n=102). Competing risk analysis showed lenvatinib significantly prolonged TTR after LTx versus the control group [sub-hazard ratio (sHR), 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17 to 0.93; P=0.031]. In the multivariate competing risk model, adjuvant lenvatinib was an independent protective factor for tumor recurrence after LTx in patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria (sHR, 0.33; 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.83; P=0.018). The rate of early recurrence within t2 years after LTx was also significantly decreased in the lenvatinib group (15.8% Conclusions: Postoperative lenvatinib administration may provide clinical benefits and is well tolerated in patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria who undergo LTx.

Indexed as

competing risk modelhepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)Lenvatinibliver transplantation (LTx)recurrence

Identifiers

PMID36388794
PMCPMC9652551
OpenAlexW4307651723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.