Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36388729›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Management of biliary stones in bariatric surgery.

Francisco Tustumi, João Emílio Lemos Pinheiro Filho, Lucas Cata Preta Stolzemburg, Leonardo Carvalho Serigiolle, Thiago Nogueira Costa, Denis Pajecki, Marco Aurélio Santo, Sérgio Carlos Nahas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biliary complications associated with weight loss, cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco TustumiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-0496
João Emílio Lemos Pinheiro FilhoDepartment of Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, Brazil.
Lucas Cata Preta StolzemburgDepartment of Gastroenterology, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leonardo Carvalho SerigiolleDepartment of Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, Brazil.
Thiago Nogueira CostaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Denis PajeckiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marco Aurélio SantoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sérgio Carlos NahasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRFaculdade de Medicina do ABC · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morbidly obese and post-bariatric surgery patients are at increased risk for biliary stones formation. The complications related to biliary stones may impose complexity on their management. This study aimed to review the management of biliary conditions in obese and bariatric patients. In this study, a narrative review was performed of the medical, surgical, and endoscopic procedures for the management of biliary stones and their related complications. Knowing the main prophylactic and therapeutic interventions options is essential for clinicians to properly manage the biliary stones in patients candidates or submitted to bariatric surgery. Plain Language Summary:

Indexed as

bariatric surgerycholecystolithiasischolelithiasisgallstonesgastric bypassgastroplasty

Identifiers

PMID36388729
PMCPMC9664186
OpenAlexW4285223574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.