ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2022
Survival comparison of stage IIA rectal cancer with or without neoadjuvant therapy: a SEER database analysis with propensity score matching.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with stage IIA rectal cancer have a higher survival rate but side effects from chemoradiotherapy; thus, whether neoadjuvant therapy should be performed for stage IIA rectal cancer is controversial. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes of patients with stage IIA rectal cancer with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Methods: Patients with stage IIA rectal cancer between 2010 and 2015 were included through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Propensity score matching was used to reduce the impact of confounding factors. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival differences were assessed using the log-rank test. Results: There were no significant differences in overall survival and cancer-specific survival between the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery groups (P=0.973 and 0.983). Compared with the surgery group, the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery + chemotherapy group had a better overall survival (P=0.007). Subgroup analysis showed that the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery + chemotherapy group had better overall survival compared to the surgery group in the subgroup containing preoperative high-risk factors (P=0.003) but not in the low-risk subgroup (P=0.685). Conclusions: There is no evidence that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery can improve overall survival and cancer-specific survival compared to surgery alone in patients with stage IIA rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery + chemotherapy can improve overall survival compared to surgery alone, but only in patients with preoperative high-risk factors. We suggest that patients with no preoperative high-risk factors may be considered for surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery + chemotherapy is recommended for patients with preoperative risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.