ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2022
Anorectal manometry after rectal surgery: a case report with rectal bleeding and perforation.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Colorectal perforation following anorectal manometry in a patient with anal stenosis post rectal prolapse repair: a rare complication.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Validation of the London Classification for Rectal Hyposensitivity in an Anorectal Manometry Database of 2540 Patients With Functional Defecatory Disorder.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2025Article
- Analysis of risk factors and intervention measures for postoperative bleeding in patients with diabetes after proctologic surgery based on a logistic regression model.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anorectal manometry (ARM) is primarily used to assess anorectal sensorimotor function. ARM provides comprehensive information about the anal sphincter and rectal sensation in patients with constipation or fecal incontinence. Generally, ARM can be applied to both adults and children. This study is the first to report a case of post-rectal resection ARM with constipation complicating rectal bleeding and perforation in a patient with no history of rectal cancer, aiming to provide guidelines for the treatment of patients who undergo ARM after rectal surgery. Case Description: A 58-year-old female patient with previous history of "hypertension and cerebral infarction" underwent "proctocolectomy" for "rectal prolapse" 11+ months ago and recovered well after the operation, but developed constipation. The patient was admitted to our hospital for anorectal manometry (ARM) for "constipation for 11+ months". 2+ hours after the examination, the patient developed blood in the stool and was hospitalized in the Department of Anorectal Surgery of our hospital. The anorectal manometry was performed 2+ hours after the patient developed blood in the stool. The patient was discharged after 30 days of hospitalization without any complications. During treatment, the patient suffered from rectal rupture and perforation. Following timely and aggressive surgery, the patient recovered and was discharged without any complications. Conclusions: ARM with balloon, as a method for detecting anorectal function, should only be performed cautiously after rectal surgery, especially among patients with comorbidities. If patients suffer from anorectal bleeding and perforation during ARM, prompt and aggressive surgical intervention is necessary. At present, there is little literature on ARM teaching courses. To improve the operation level of ARM and reduce the incidence of complications, we should extend understandings of ARM, develop a systematic management plan, and continuously summarize ARM-related experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.