Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36388350›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

An estimate assay for low-level exposure to ionizing radiation based on mass spectrometry quantification of γ-H2AX in human peripheral blood lymphocytes.

Hongling Zhao, Minmin Qu, Yuchen Li, Ke Wen, Hua Xu, Man Song, Dafei Xie, Xingkun Ao, Yihao Gong, Li Sui and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Histone Phosphorylation in DNA Damage Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of Low Dose Neutron-Gamma Field on Cell Cycle and Damage of Human Lymphocytes.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hongling ZhaoBeijing Key Laboratory for Radiobiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Minmin QuState Key Laboratory of Toxicology and Medical Countermeasures and Laboratory of Toxicant Analysis, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Beijing, China.
Yuchen LiBeijing Key Laboratory for Radiobiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ke WenBeijing Key Laboratory for Radiobiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Hua XuState Key Laboratory of Toxicology and Medical Countermeasures and Laboratory of Toxicant Analysis, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Beijing, China.
Man SongBeijing Key Laboratory for Radiobiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Dafei XieBeijing Key Laboratory for Radiobiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xingkun AoBeijing Key Laboratory for Radiobiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yihao GongDepartment of Nuclear Physics, China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China.
Li SuiDepartment of Nuclear Physics, China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China.
Hua GuanBeijing Key Laboratory for Radiobiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Pingkun ZhouBeijing Key Laboratory for Radiobiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jianwei XieState Key Laboratory of Toxicology and Medical Countermeasures and Laboratory of Toxicant Analysis, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Beijing, China.
China Institute of Atomic Energy · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to environmental ionizing radiation (IR) is ubiquitous, and large-dose exposure to IR is known to cause DNA damage and genotoxicity which is associated with an increased risk of cancer. Whether such detrimental effects are caused by exposure to low-dose IR is still debated. Therefore, rapid and early estimation of absorbed doses of IR in individuals, especially at low levels, using radiation response markers is a pivotal step for early triage during radiological incidents to provide adequate and timely clinical interventions. However, there is currently a crucial shortage of methods capable of determining the extent of low-dose IR exposure to human beings. The phosphorylation of histone H2AX on serine 139 (designated γ-H2AX), a classic biological dosimeter, can be used to evaluate the DNA damage response. We have developed an estimation assay for low-level exposure to IR based on the mass spectrometry quantification of γ-H2AX in blood. Human peripheral blood lymphocytes sensitive to low-dose IR, maintaining low temperature (4°C) and adding enzyme inhibitor are proven to be key steps, possibly insuring that a stable and marked γ-H2AX signal in blood cells exposed to low-dose IR could be detected. For the first time, DNA damage at low dose exposures to IR as low as 0.01 Gy were observed using the sensitive variation of γ-H2AX with high throughput mass spectrometry quantification in human peripheral blood, which is more accurate than the previously reported methods by virtue of isotope-dilution mass spectrometry, and can observe the time effect of DNA damage. These

Indexed as

LymphocytesRadiation, IonizingDNA DamageDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansMass Spectrometryhuman peripheral blood lymphocytesionizing radiationlow-dose exposuremass spectrometryγ-H2AX

Identifiers

PMID36388350
PMCPMC9651621
OpenAlexW4307701963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.