Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36388325›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Assessment of knowledge and attitude of healthcare professionals regarding the use of telemedicine: A cross-sectional study from rural areas of Sindh, Pakistan.

Grouve Kumar, Harsha Komal Shardha, Waleed Tariq, Mansoor Ahmed Qazi, Kantesh Kumar, Chandni Maheshwari, Atif Hussain, Muhammad Junaid Tahir, Jharna Bai, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Grouve KumarGambat Medical College, Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences (PAQSJIMS), Gambat, Pakistan.
Harsha Komal ShardhaPeoples University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women, Nawabshah, Pakistan.
Waleed TariqLahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mansoor Ahmed QaziGambat Medical College, Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences (PAQSJIMS), Gambat, Pakistan.
Kantesh KumarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Chandni MaheshwariPeoples University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women, Nawabshah, Pakistan.
Atif HussainShaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Junaid TahirLahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Jharna BaiShaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University, Larkana, Pakistan.
Muhammad Sohaib AsgharDow University of Health Sciences-Ojha Campus, Karachi, Pakistan.
Dow University of Health Sciences · PKLahore General Hospital · PKShaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University · PKShaikh Zayed Postgraduate Medical Institute · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine has proved its significance in the healthcare system, especially during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as it assists in the provision of early and effective healthcare to those in distant areas. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitude of healthcare professionals toward the use of telemedicine in the rural areas of Sindh, Pakistan. Materials and methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted with 212 healthcare professionals including physicians, consultants, surgeons, residents, dentists, and house officers working in public sector hospitals. The face-to-face method was used for data collection. Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were applied to find the association between different variables and knowledge and practice of telemedicine using SPSS V 24. Results: The knowledge of participants regarding the usability of telemedicine and various tools used for the provision of medical services (video consultations, conferencing, use of applications, software, and online groups) was good. A total of 52.2% of participants showed agreement when they were questioned about being aware of online healthcare service provision. In this study, 52.8% of the participants practiced telemedicine by delivering healthcare services through online consultations. The majority of the participants were surgeons (25.9%), residents (23.1%), and physicians (18.9%). The internet (42.4%) and public media (25.9%) were the major sources of information for telemedicine. A total of 70.5% of participants suggested that strategies and efforts should be directed toward the enhanced implementation of telemedicine. Training in telemedicine as a source of information [OR = 13.02 (95% CI = 3.9-43.6), Conclusion: Telemedicine has technologically revolutionized the medical sciences worldwide. The awareness level and usage of telemedicine were good among healthcare professionals in rural Sindh. Telemedicine should be utilized to provide quality healthcare in underprivileged areas by investing in infrastructure and education.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansPakistanCOVID-19remote consultationruralteleconsultationtelemonitoring

Identifiers

PMID36388325
PMCPMC9643734
OpenAlexW4307349946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.