Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36388274›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Religious affiliation as a driver of immunization coverage: Analyses of zero-dose vaccine prevalence in 66 low- and middle-income countries.

Thiago M Santos, Bianca O Cata-Preta, Andrea Wendt, Luisa Arroyave, Daniel R Hogan, Tewodaj Mengistu, Aluisio J D Barros, Cesar G Victora

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thiago M SantosPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Bianca O Cata-PretaPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Andrea WendtPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Luisa ArroyavePostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Daniel R HoganGavi, The Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland.
Tewodaj MengistuGavi, The Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland.
Aluisio J D BarrosPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Cesar G VictoraPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRGavi · CHPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BR

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 101815/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The literature on the association between religion and immunization coverage is scant, mostly consisting of single-country studies. Analyses in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) to assess whether the proportions of zero-dose children vary according to religion remains necessary to better understand non-socioeconomic immunization barriers and to inform interventions that target zero-dose children. Methods: We included 66 LMICs with standardized national surveys carried out since 2010, with information on religion and vaccination. The proportion of children who failed to receive any doses of a diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) containing vaccine - a proxy for no access to routine vaccination or "zero-dose" status - was the outcome. Differences among religious groups were assessed using a test for heterogeneity. Additional analyses were performed controlling for the fixed effect of country, household wealth, maternal education, and urban-rural residence to assess associations between religion and immunization. Findings: In 27 countries there was significant heterogeneity in no-DPT prevalence according to religion. Pooled analyses adjusted for wealth, maternal education, and area of residence showed that Muslim children had 76% higher no-DPT prevalence than Christian children. Children from the majority religion in each country tended to have lower no-DPT prevalence than the rest of the population except in Muslim-majority countries. Interpretation: Analyses of gaps in coverage according to religion are relevant to renewing efforts to reach groups that are being left behind, with an important role in the reduction of zero-dose children.

Indexed as

Vaccination CoverageVaccinesChildDeveloping CountriesHumansIncomePrevalenceVaccinesdiphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccineglobal healthimmunizationinequalityreligionsocioeconomic factorsvaccination

Identifiers

PMID36388274
PMCPMC9642099
OpenAlexW4307372108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.