Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36388161›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

The Cuproptosis-Related Long Noncoding RNA Signature Predicts Prognosis and Tumour Immune Analysis in Osteosarcoma.

Jinxia Jiang, Dejun Chu, Xingming Lai, Li Liu, Jun Tao

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Musculoskeletal disorders: does cuproptosis hold the key?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cuproptosis and its potential role in musculoskeletal disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinxia JiangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, China.
Dejun ChuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3975-8180
Xingming LaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Guilin People's Hospital, China.
Li LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, China.
Jun TaoDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2333-4882
Nanchang University · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cuprotopsis is a type of programmed cell death discovered in recent years. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play an important regulatory role in programmed cell death. The effect of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs on osteosarcoma is unknown. Our work, based on cuproptosis-related lncRNAs, proposes a gene signature to assess the prognosis of patients with osteosarcoma. Methods: Osteosarcoma gene expression data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), clinical features of osteosarcoma and RNA sequencing data of normal adipose tissue were obtained from the UCSC Xena database. A cuproptosis-related lncRNA risk model was established to calculate the risk score. At the same time, cluster analysis, clinicopathological analysis, functional enrichment analysis, and prediction of compounds with potential therapeutic value were evaluated. We analyzed whether there was a correlation between the risk score and tumour immunity. RT-qPCR was used to verify the expression level of lncRNA. Results: Nine lncRNAs (AC124798.1, AC006033.2, AL450344.2, AL512625.2, LINC01060, LINC00837, AC004943.2, AC064836.3, and AC100821.2) were identified to create a risk model and indicate the prognosis of patients with osteosarcoma. The high-risk group had a worse prognosis than the low-risk group. Analysis of clinicopathological features, principal component analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve, c-index curve, and comparative analysis of models proved that the model is reliable. Functional enrichment analysis suggests that the risk score may correlate with cell energy metabolism and tumour-related biological function. Three potentially therapeutic compounds have been predicted. These analyses may be beneficial to the treatment of osteosarcoma in the future. RT-qPCR verified the expression level of three lncRNA (LINC01060, NKILA, and SNHG8). Conclusions: Cuproptosis-related lncRNAs have a strong relationship with osteosarcoma patients. Nine lncRNA models can effectively forecast the prognosis of osteosarcoma and may play a significant role in the individualized treatment of osteosarcoma patients in the future.

Indexed as

ApoptosisBone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaRNA, Long NoncodingBiomarkers, TumorCopperGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCopperRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID36388161
PMCPMC9646308
OpenAlexW4307977328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.