Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36388142›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2022

Predicting recurrence risks in lung cancer patients using multimodal radiomics and random survival forests.

Jaryd R Christie, Omar Daher, Mohamed Abdelrazek, Perrin E Romine, Richard A Malthaner, Mehdi Qiabi, Rahul Nayak, Sandy Napel, Viswam S Nair, Sarah A Mattonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluating clinical and radiomic features for predicting lung cancer recurrence pre- and post-tumor resection.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jaryd R ChristieWestern University, Department of Medical Biophysics, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7063-0401
Omar DaherWestern University, Department of Medical Imaging, London, Ontario, Canada.
Mohamed AbdelrazekWestern University, Department of Medical Imaging, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5626-8223
Perrin E RomineFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Clinical Research Division, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Richard A MalthanerWestern University, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3763-4838
Mehdi QiabiWestern University, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, London, Ontario, Canada.
Rahul NayakWestern University, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1652-0417
Sandy NapelStanford University, Department of Radiology, Stanford, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6876-5507
Viswam S NairFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Clinical Research Division, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Sarah A MattonenWestern University, Department of Medical Biophysics, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8172-1074

Funding

TRAINING IN CANCER BIOLOGY &TRANSPLANTATIONT32CA009515 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NANCY ELLEN DAVIDSON, Effie W Petersdorf · 1985 to 2026
$16.2M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We developed a model integrating multimodal quantitative imaging features from tumor and nontumor regions, qualitative features, and clinical data to improve the risk stratification of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Approach: We retrospectively analyzed 135 patients [mean age, 69 years (43 to 87, range); 100 male patients and 35 female patients] with NSCLC who underwent upfront surgical resection between 2008 and 2012. The tumor and peritumoral regions on both preoperative CT and FDG PET-CT and the vertebral bodies L3 to L5 on FDG PET were segmented to assess the tumor and bone marrow uptake, respectively. Radiomic features were extracted and combined with clinical and CT qualitative features. A random survival forest model was developed using the top-performing features to predict the time to recurrence/progression in the training cohort ( Results: The model, consisting of stage, three wavelet texture features, and three wavelet first-order features, achieved a concordance of 0.78 and 0.76 in the training and testing cohorts, respectively, significantly outperforming the baseline stage-only model results of 0.67 ( Conclusions: Our radiomic model, consisting of stage and tumor, peritumoral, and bone marrow features from CT and FDG PET-CT significantly stratified patients into low- and high-risk of recurrence/progression.

Indexed as

computed tomographylung cancermachine learningpositron emission tomographyradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36388142
PMCPMC9641263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.