ArticleTranslational cancer research2022
Is it justified to assess the resectability of pancreatic cancer combined with biological and conditional factors?
Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reappraisal of the current resectability criteria and optimal treatment strategies for pancreatic cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Currently Debated Topics on Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Narrative Review on Surgical Treatment of Borderline Resectable, Locally Advanced, and Synchronous or Metachronous Oligometastatic Tumor.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the biological and conditional resectability criteria for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), as proposed by the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), as well as to identify the role of biological and conditional factors in assessing the resectability of PDAC. Methods: The clinical data of PDAC patients who underwent upfront open/laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD/LPD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP/LDP) at our hospital between January 2013 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who were diagnosed with anatomically resectable PDAC, as defined by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline of PDAC guideline Version 1.2020, were enrolled. Based on IAP-criteria, these patients were divided into two groups, including IAP-resectable (IAP-R) and IAP Borderline Resectable (IAP-BR). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups. In order to identify independent biological and conditional predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of enrolled patients, an analysis was performed through the use of a Cox proportional-hazard model. Results: Overall, 97 patients were included in this study. Among them, 38 patients were IAP-R and 59 patients were IAP-BR. Compared to the IAP-R group, the IAP-BR group had a higher early recurrence rate (62.7% Conclusions: The prognosis of patients with PDAC that undergo resection can be predicted more accurately by assessing the resectability of pancreatic cancer combined with anatomical and biological factors according to IAP criteria. Whether conditional factors should be included in the resectability criteria needs to be validated by prospective and large cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.