ArticleTranslational cancer research2022
Development and validation of a novel ubiquitination-related gene prognostic signature based on tumor microenvironment for colon cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Isoform alterations in the ubiquitination machinery impacting gastrointestinal malignancies.Cell death & disease · 2024Review
- Comprehensive pan-cancer analysis identifies FHL2 associated with poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colon cancer (CC) is one of the most common cancers with high morbidity globally. Ubiquitination is involved in the characterization of multiple biological processes, and some ubiquitinated enzymes are associated with the prognosis of CC. However, the prognostic model associated with ubiquitination-related genes (URGs) for CC is unavailable. Methods: Gene expression data, somatic mutations, transcriptome profiles, microsatellite instability status (MSI) status, and clinical information for CC were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. Seven URGs were used for establishing a prognostic prediction model, which was constructed and validated in GSE17538. Besides, genomic variance analysis (GSVA) was used to explore further the differences in biological pathway activation status between the high-risk and low-risk groups. Finally, the single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) and ESTIMATE algorithm analysis were used to characterize the cellular infiltration in the microenvironment. Results: A seven-URG prognostic signature was established, based on which patients in the training and test groups could be divided into high-risk and low-risk groups. The results demonstrated that the model has a solid ability to predict the prognosis of CC patients. Conclusions: We established a prognostic prediction model for CC based on ubiquitination. Then we analyzed the genetic characteristics associated with ubiquitination and the tumor microenvironment (TME) cell infiltration in CC. These results are worthy of exploring new clinical treatment strategies for CC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.