ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022
Impulsive time series modeling with application to luteinizing hormone data.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-time estimations of blood glucose concentrations from sweat measurements using the local density random walk model.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work considers the estimation of impulsive time series pertaining to biomedical systems and, in particular, to endocrine ones. We assume a signal model in the form of the output of a continuous linear time-invariant system driven by a sequence of instantaneous impulses, which concept is utilized here, in particular, for modeling of the male reproductive hormone axis. An estimation method to identify the impulsive sequence and the continuous system dynamics from sampled measurements of the output is proposed. Hinging on thorough mathematical analysis, the method improves upon a previously developed least-squares algorithm by resolving the trade-off between model fit and input sparsity, thus removing the need for manual tuning of user-defined estimation algorithm parameters. Experiments with synthetic data and Markov chain Monte-Carlo estimation demonstrate the viability of the proposed method, but also indicate that measurement noise renders the estimation problem ill-posed, as multiple estimates along a curve in the parameter space yield similar fits to data. The method is furthermore applied to clinical luteinizing hormone data collected from healthy males and, for comparability, one female, with similar results. Comparison between the estimated and theoretical elimination rates, as well as simulation of the estimated models, demonstrate the efficacy of the method. The sensitivity of the impulse distribution to the estimated elimination rates is investigated on a subject-specific data subset, revealing that the input sequence and elimination rate estimates can be interdependent. The dose-dependent effect of a selective gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor antagonist on the frequency and weights of the estimated impulses is also analyzed; a significant impact of the medication on the impulse weights is confirmed. To demonstrate the feasibility of the estimation approach for other hormones with pulsatile secretion, the modeling of cortisol data sets collected from three female adolescents was performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.