Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36387840›Full record

ArticleSexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP2022

Perceptions of Sexual Risk, PrEP Services, and Peer Navigation Support among HIV-Negative Latinx and Black Men who have Sex with Men (MSM) Residing in Western Washington.

Jahn Jaramillo, Jade Pagkas-Bather, Kimiam Waters, Louis B Shackelford, Russell D Campbell, Jsani Henry, Vanessa Grandberry, Luis F Ramirez, Lorenzo Cervantes, Joanne Stekler and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jahn JaramilloDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jade Pagkas-BatherDepartment of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases & Global Health, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Kimiam WatersCollege of Arts & Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Louis B ShackelfordFred Hutchinson Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Seattle, WA, USA.
Russell D CampbellFred Hutchinson Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jsani HenryPublic Health- Seattle & King County HIV/STD Program, Seattle, WA, USA.
Vanessa GrandberryUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Luis F RamirezLatino Community Fund of Washington State, Seattle WA, USA.
Lorenzo CervantesPierce County AIDS Foundation, Tacoma, WA, USA.
Joanne SteklerDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Michele P AndrasikDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Susan M GrahamDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USInfectious Disease Research Institute · USChicago Department of Public Health · USHeritage Fund · USPublic Health – Seattle & King County · USTacoma Pierce County Health Department · US

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CONNIE L CELUM · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
HOST DEFENSE TRAINING IN ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASEST32AI007044 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVID Neal FREDRICKS · 1985 to 2026
$14.6M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: HIV PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis) is underutilized among Latinx and Black men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States. Although peer navigation approaches may increase PrEP uptake and adherence, it remains unclear what strategies work best for MSM of color. Methods: From July 2017 to August 2018, we conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 25 purposively sampled Latinx and Black cisgender MSM to evaluate how the intersectionality of race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and other identities influenced men's views on PrEP in general and on peer navigation specifically. Thematic analysis was used to identify and analyze emergent themes. Results: Emergent themes included: (1) awareness of vulnerability in intimate relationships; (2) barriers to PrEP initiation including perceived side effects, stigma, and financial concerns; (3) a wish to connect with other Latinx and Black MSM in a health and prevention space; and (4) the desire for peer matching based on identity considerations and lived experience. Younger men and Spanish-speaking Latinx men were most interested in peer navigation to access PrEP, while bisexual men had confidentiality concerns. Conclusions: In our study, Latinx and Black MSM viewed peer navigation services favorably, especially if they addressed men's desire to connect with other MSM of color. Policy Implications: Developing culturally-congruent peer navigation programming could help improve PrEP uptake and care engagement for Latinx and Black MSM. Programs should recruit peers from the racial/ethnic minority communities most impacted by HIV and prioritize matching peers to clients based on identity concerns, needs, and preferences.

Indexed as

Black MSMHIV preventionidentityintersectionalityLatinx men who have sex with men (MSM)peer navigationPre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

Identifiers

PMID36387840
PMCPMC9642978
OpenAlexW3169838157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.