Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36387825›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022

Rectal cancer combined with abdominal tuberculosis: A case report.

Pei-Gen Liu, Xiang-Fan Chen, Pan-Feng Feng

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 75% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pei-Gen LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Central Hospital of Panzhihua City, Panzhihua 617000, Sichuan Province, China.
Xiang-Fan ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University, Nantong 226000, Jiangsu Province, China.
Pan-Feng FengDepartment of Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University, Nantong 226000, Jiangsu Province, China. 929083891@qq.com.
Nantong University · CNPanzhihua Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is very rare to suffer from colorectal adenocarcinoma and abdominal tuberculosis simultaneously. Even in a country such as China, where tuberculosis is still endemic, its diagnosis and treatment are challenging. This article describes in detail a case of rectal cancer complicated by abdominal tuberculosis and its pathological features. CASE SUMMARY: We outline the case of a 71-year-old female who was admitted with intermittent blood in the stool over the past year. The patient was diagnosed with low rectal cancer and received neoadjuvant therapy. The patient then returned to the hospital for surgery, but diffusely distributed nodules were found during laparoscopic exploration. The diagnosis of rectal cancer with extensive metastasis was considered during the operation. There was no opportunity for radical surgery. Thus, nodules were taken for pathological examination, and the abdomen was closed. The histopathological diagnosis was tuberculous granuloma, and the patient was treated with standardized anti-tuberculosis drugs in a specialized hospital. Later, the patient again came to our hospital and underwent abdominoperineal resection. She was discharged 10 d after the operation in good clinical condition.

conclusionWe aim to emphasize the importance of preoperative and postoperative pathological examination in diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

Abdominal tuberculosisCase reportExtrapulmonary tuberculosisPeritoneal nodulesRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID36387825
PMCPMC9649531
OpenAlexW4307251049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.