Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36387785›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022

Efficacy of the femoral neck system in femoral neck fracture treatment in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhi-Fang Wu, Zi-Heng Luo, Liu-Chao Hu, Yi-Wen Luo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Low reoperation rate after fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures with the femoral neck system (FNS).European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhi-Fang WuDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics and Traumatology of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou 510378, Guangdong Province, China.
Zi-Heng LuoDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics and Traumatology of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou 510378, Guangdong Province, China.
Liu-Chao HuDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics and Traumatology of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou 510378, Guangdong Province, China.
Yi-Wen LuoDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics and Traumatology of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou 510378, Guangdong Province, China. gzzyydxlyw@126.com.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControversy remains around the available choices for the internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture. The femoral neck system (FNS) was developed in 2018 and has been widely applied since then as it can provide rigid fixation stability with less damage to the bone mass around the fracture. However, no systematic reviews and meta-analyses have investigated the efficacy of the FNS in comparison with that of traditional internal fixation in the treatment of femoral fractures.

aimTo assess the efficacy of the FNS in comparison with that of cannulated compression screws (CCS) in the treatment of femoral fractures through systematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsFive electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang) were searched from the earliest publication date to December 31, 2021. Reference Citation Analysis (https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/) was used to check the results and further analyze the related articles. Controlled trials were included if the FNS was applied for the femoral neck fracture in adults and if it was compared with CCS for the achievement of internal fixation. The measurement outcomes included the required operation time, observed patient's blood loss, extent of fracture healing, patient's Harris Hip score (HHS) at the last follow-up, and records of any complications (such as failure of internal fixation, femoral neck shortness, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and delayed union or nonunion).

resultsTen retrospective controlled studies (involving 711 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that compared with CCS, use of the FNS could not decrease the operation time [standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.98 to 0.22,

conclusionCompared with CCS, the FNS could decrease the chances of developing femoral neck shortness and delayed union or nonunion in adults with femoral neck fractures. Simultaneously, it could accelerate fracture healing and improve the HHS in these patients.

Indexed as

Femoral neck fractureInternal fixatorsMeta-analysisSystematic reviewTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID36387785
PMCPMC9649536
OpenAlexW4307559918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.