Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36387780›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2022

Challenges in the transition to independent radiation oncology practice and targeted interventions for improvement.

Alexandra N De Leo, Nicolette Drescher, James E Bates, Anamaria R Yeung

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Scholarship in radiation oncology education.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra N De LeoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Nicolette DrescherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
James E BatesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anamaria R YeungDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Florida College · USEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous radiation oncology residents and junior attendings have identified common weaknesses in residency training that hinder the transition from training to independent practice. Recurrent themes include not only general autonomy but also proficiency in technical skills, such as treatment plan review and image verification, and nontechnical skills, such as leadership, mentorship, and education. While multiple strategies to address these deficiencies have been investigated, many are not widely available or may be difficult to implement. We aim to summarize the frequently cited challenges in the transition to independent radiation oncology practice as well as the pertinent interventions that have been explored.

Indexed as

Career preparednessRadiation oncologyResidencyTransition to practice

Identifiers

PMID36387780
PMCPMC9641029
OpenAlexW4298008938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.