Differences in peri-hip articular pain after total hip arthroplasty between taper wedge stem and fit-and-fill stem.

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for hip disorders helps to alleviate pain and improve active daily life. When determining the effects of medical therapy and the subsequent clinical results, patient quality of life (QOL) also needs to be assessed. Recently, patient-reported outcomes (PRO) have become important as evaluation criteria. This study aimed to evaluate patient QOL and various PRO between different types of cementless stems and to clarify the relationship between PRO and stem-cortical bone contact. Methods: The study comprised 138 consecutive patients undergoing cementless THA for hip osteoarthritis. We assessed three different types of PRO: the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip-Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), patient's joint perception, and peri-hip articular joint pain (PHAP). We measured the state of contact between femur and implant by density mapping. Results: No significant difference was noted in PRO between stem types based on the JHEQ and patient's joint perception. PHAP occurred more frequently in the patients with a taper wedge stem versus a fit-and-fill stem. In both groups, distal contact was associated with PHAP but not with JHEQ results and patient's joint perception. Conclusion: The difference in PHAP between the two stem types groups was significant, with postoperative PHAP being higher with the taper wedge stem because of the more distal contact between the taper wedge stem and femur cortical bone.