Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36387749›Full record

ArticleHealth information science and systems2022

Automated robust human emotion classification system using hybrid EEG features with ICBrainDB dataset.

Erkan Deniz, Nebras Sobahi, Naaman Omar, Abdulkadir Sengur, U Rajendra Acharya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health information science and systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erkan DenizElectrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Technology Faculty, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Nebras SobahiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Naaman OmarDepartment of Information Technology Management, Administration Technical College, Duhok Polytechnic University, Duhok, Iraq.
Abdulkadir SengurElectrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Technology Faculty, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1614-2639
U Rajendra AcharyaDepartment of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Ngee Ann Polytechnic, Singapore, 599489 Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion identification is an essential task for human-computer interaction systems. Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals have been widely used in emotion recognition. So far, there have been several EEG-based emotion recognition datasets that the researchers have used to validate their developed models. Hence, we have used a new ICBrainDB EEG dataset to classify angry, neutral, happy, and sad emotions in this work. Signal processing-based wavelet transform (WT), tunable Q-factor wavelet transform (TQWT), and image processing-based histogram of oriented gradients (HOG), local binary pattern (LBP), and convolutional neural network (CNN) features have been used extracted from the EEG signals. The WT is used to extract the rhythms from each channel of the EEG signal. The instantaneous frequency and spectral entropy are computed from each EEG rhythm signal. The average, and standard deviation of instantaneous frequency, and spectral entropy of each rhythm of the signal are the final feature vectors. The spectral entropy in each channel of the EEG signal after performing the TQWT is used to create the feature vectors in the second signal side method. Each EEG channel is transformed into time-frequency plots using the synchrosqueezed wavelet transform. Then, the feature vectors are constructed individually using windowed HOG and LBP features. Also, each channel of the EEG data is fed to a pretrained CNN to extract the features. In the feature selection process, the ReliefF feature selector is employed. Various feature classification algorithms namely, k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machines, and neural networks are used for the automated classification of angry, neutral, happy, and sad emotions. Our developed model obtained an average accuracy of 90.7% using HOG features and a KNN classifier with a tenfold cross-validation strategy.

Indexed as

EEG signalsEmotion recognitionICBrainDB datasetImage-based featuresSignal

Identifiers

PMID36387749
PMCPMC9649575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.