Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36387723›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022

Azithromycin use in Covid- 19: A tale of changing guidelines.

Harish Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Time to revise COVID -19 protocol-Do we know the correct direction?Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harish GuptaDepartment of Medicine, KG's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
King George's Medical University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been more than two years since the arrival of Covid-19 pandemic on world stage. When we look back during landmark events of last two years, several ones stand out. And one of these is utilization and then going out- of- favor of use of an antibiotic - Azithromycin. Pilva- a Croatian pharmaceutical company- headquartered in Zagreb in late 1970s discovered the drug. Then several years of research yielded a product which was highly effective and provided good therapeutic results. As this was a small company having limited resources, it made a licensing agreement with Pfizer to sell the drug at marked geographies. While initial reason of its use in SARS-CoV-2 infection was its supposedly immunomodulatory effect yet randomized controlled trials demonstrated a lack of a beneficial effect for this indication. Therefore, when recollecting our journey with the mutant Coronavirus during last two years, it's necessary to remember that when trying to discover a useful drug for the disease, we had several misses as well. As usual in Medical science, most of the hits have several collateral misses, even though this drug carries with it certain unique features. In the Editorial I chronicle a few such distinguishing features.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial drug resistanceCovid-19 epidemicmedical expertsmicrobiomemutant SARS-CoV-2 virus

Identifiers

PMID36387723
PMCPMC9648315
OpenAlexW4289210185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.