ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Azithromycin use in Covid- 19: A tale of changing guidelines.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repurposing clinically available drugs and therapies for pathogenic targets to combat SARS-CoV-2.MedComm · 2023Review
- Time to revise COVID -19 protocol-Do we know the correct direction?Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been more than two years since the arrival of Covid-19 pandemic on world stage. When we look back during landmark events of last two years, several ones stand out. And one of these is utilization and then going out- of- favor of use of an antibiotic - Azithromycin. Pilva- a Croatian pharmaceutical company- headquartered in Zagreb in late 1970s discovered the drug. Then several years of research yielded a product which was highly effective and provided good therapeutic results. As this was a small company having limited resources, it made a licensing agreement with Pfizer to sell the drug at marked geographies. While initial reason of its use in SARS-CoV-2 infection was its supposedly immunomodulatory effect yet randomized controlled trials demonstrated a lack of a beneficial effect for this indication. Therefore, when recollecting our journey with the mutant Coronavirus during last two years, it's necessary to remember that when trying to discover a useful drug for the disease, we had several misses as well. As usual in Medical science, most of the hits have several collateral misses, even though this drug carries with it certain unique features. In the Editorial I chronicle a few such distinguishing features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.