ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Bronchial mucus plug mimicking fragmented Ascaris worm: An ambiguous case presentation.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With increasing travel and immunosuppression, parasitic lung and pleural diseases are increasingly been reported. The diagnosis in certain cases is very challenging because of nonspecific clinical and radiological features. We hereby present a case of a 60-year-old immunocompetent female complaining of difficulty in breathing for 4-5 days for which sputum sample along with the coughed-up fragment of the parasite under investigation was sent to the laboratory. All the blood parameters along with blood and sputum culture were within normal limits. Direct microscopy for sputum and multiple fecal samples did not yield any significant information. Chest X-ray was normal, whereas contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan changes were suggestive of fibrotic changes and mucoid impaction. The histopathological examination showed thick mucus content and no evidence of a parasitic infestation, worm, larva, or ova. So the differential diagnosis of the right lower lobe obstruction probably due to mucus plug was made, and the patient was referred to a pulmonologist for further follow-up. This case highlights the importance of common respiratory disorders characterized by mucus plugs and that some may mimic parasitic segments. Specific clinical, radiological, and pathologic features, microscopic examination, or serological testing can help to narrow the differential diagnosis of infective or noninfective causes and help the patients in early and accurate diagnosis and treatment and save them from unnecessary expensive and invasive investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.