ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
A cross-sectional study on stigma and discrimination confronted by HIV positive patients in the economic capital of India.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: HIV/AIDS is a serious public health, economic and social problem. Stigma is a common human reaction to disease and discrimination follows stigma. Stigma and discrimination act as impediments to uptake of HIV testing, treatment, care and adherence to treatment. Aim: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of the stigma and discrimination faced by HIV positive patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). Settings and Design: A cross-sectional, observational study conducted at ART center of a tertiary care hospital in an urban area. Methods and Material: Participants were selected by simple random sampling among HIV positive patients. A predesigned, pretested and self-administered, semi-structured questionnaire in local language was used to assess stigma and discrimination. Statistical Analysis Used: The data were entered in Microsoft Excel and analyzed with SPSS version 20 statistical software. Simple proportions, mean, standard deviation, median, range and inter-quartile range were calculated. Results: Of 336 participants, 170 were male, whereas 166 were females. The mean age was 36.42 years. The total mean scores for Berger's HIV stigma scale experienced was 122.82, whereas for individual subscale Personalized stigma, Negative self-image, public attitudes and disclosure of HIV status were 38.31, 27.46, 33.09 and 23.97, respectively. The maximum participants expressed the stigma regarding disclosure concerns (58.63%) followed by negative self-image stigma (43.45%). Conclusions: Stigma hurdles the delivery of effective medical social care. People Living with HIV and AIDS (PLWHA) need to have greater involvement in their care, support and treatment. Support groups of PLWHA need to be established so that stigma and discrimination at various levels can be challenged collectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.