ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Predictors for mucormycosis in COVID era: A case-control study from Gujarat.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Mucormycosis has been increasingly described in the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) era, however, there is a lack of robust epidemiological studies to understand the predictors for the development of mucormycosis from India. Aims: To document the risk factors of mucormycosis with or without COVID-19 and estimate the strength of association of various risk factors. Settings and Design: A case-control study was conducted in the Ahmedabad districts of Gujarat from June to August 2021. Methods and Material: One hundred participants (25 cases with mucor, 75 without mucor) were enrolled in the study. The cases and controls were then matched based on age and gender. Ethical approval was sought from the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar, Gujrat, India. Statistical Analysis Used: Data were collected using the Epi Collect 5 application, and the descriptive, inferential analysis was done using the SPSS version 21 statistical software. Results: About 68% of the cases were from a rural area and had past comorbidity conditions. About 80% of the cases reported a previous history of COVID-19, whereas 67% of the controls reported the same. The factors which remained significant after applying the hierarchical model were rural residents (OR = 3.2 [95% CI: 1.05-10.3]) and history of oxygen therapy (OR = 5.42 [95% CI: 1.24-23.8]). Conclusions: This study concludes that mucormycosis is independent of the COVID-19 status. Rural residents and oxygen therapy were found to be the most significant risk factors for mucormycosis. The findings of this study are also not conclusive to establish an association; thus, further exploration and in-depth research with larger samples are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.