Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36387636›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022

Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) practices among people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA) - need to relook, in the era of COVID-19 pandemic.

Kasi Viswanath, Ravishekar N Hiremath, S R Manjunath, D B Kadam, Rishi Raj, Smita M Nimbannavar, Mahesh Krishna Kulkarni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kasi ViswanathDepartment of Community Medicine, AFMS, New Delhi, India.
Ravishekar N HiremathDepartment of Community Medicine, AFMS, New Delhi, India.
S R ManjunathDepartment of Community Medicine, AFMS, New Delhi, India.
D B KadamDepartment of Medicine (Retd), BJ Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Rishi RajDepartment of Medical Informatics, AFMS, New Delhi, India.
Smita M NimbannavarDepartment of Community Medicine, Koppal Institute of Medical Sciences, AFMS, New Delhi, India.
Mahesh Krishna KulkarniDepartment of Aviation Medicine, AFMS, New Delhi, India.
National Institute of Medical Statistics · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) practices always have been neglected among HIV/AIDS (Human immunodeficiency virus/ Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) programs, even when HIV and WaSH services have robust bearing on each other. With COVID-19 pandemic on the go, it is utmost necessary for the people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA) to ensure adequate WaSH practices. Objective: This study was carried out with an objective to assess baseline WaSH practices among PLHA and to find out if any association between nutritional status and WaSH parameters so as to identify the shortcomings and highlight the importance of WaSH practices among PLHAs and give suitable recommendations to program managers. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was carried out among PLHA registered in ART centres of western Maharashtra. A sample size of 378 consented to be part of the study were included in the study, by means of systematic random sampling. Data were collected by means of pretested questionnaire prepared from guidelines and previous studies. Institutional ethical clearance was obtained and informed consent was taken from study participants before data collection. Strict confidentiality was maintained throughout the study period. Results: When asked about the water processing method, 76% of them told they do not treat/process the water supplied to them. In contrast, only a few PLHA told they would filter (17%), boil (7%), and use aquaguard (1%). The majority (67%) had their latrines, and while 29% of them were using public latrines and its hygienic sanitation was a concern for them and 4% were still practising open-air defecation in rural areas. Almost all study participants were handwashing after toilet use and handwashing before consuming food. The majority (79%) told they used soap and water, while 20% were using only water, soil and water (1%) and ash and water (1%) which was a concern. Of all the households, 87% cooked their food twice and consumed it thrice a day, while 4% prepared thrice. 10% of them cooked only once and consumed thrice a day; 56% practised consumption of leftover food of the previous night which was a concern. A majority (54%) did not consume street food while remaining said that they used to consume street food. But majority (59%) said they did not follow the habit of checking hygiene or sanitation of hotel where they used to consume food while the remaining 41% did not check the hotel before ordering the food; 50% of them bought packaged milk while 40.9% brought from unpasteurized dairy. On analysis, hygiene and sanitation factors had no statistically significant association with the nutritional status of study participants. Conclusion: WaSH factors act synergistically with other factors to affect the holistic health of PLHA. Information, Education and Communication (IEC) activities (continuous and regular), that focus on improving awareness level on WaSH practices, need to be promoted and integrated into HIV program, including providing basic care packages to PLHA like household water treatment products and soap, etc., Such measures will go a long way in maintaining health of PLHA even during ongoing COVID-19 pandemic scenario.

Indexed as

HIV/AIDShygienesanitationwater

Identifiers

PMID36387636
PMCPMC9648289
OpenAlexW4289355453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.