ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Comprehensive structured training on occupational health hazards and vaccination: A novel initiative toward employee safety.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Healthcare providers are vulnerable to occupational health hazards. However, they do not appropriately apprehend the serious health consequences of occupational exposures. This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of "Occupational health hazards and vaccination" workshop organized periodically in institute. Material and Methods: We validated the questionnaire prior to assess the effectiveness of workshop. Expert performed "key check" of questionnaire. Item analysis of one best item questions was performed using difficulty index (p value), discrimination indices (DI), distractor efficiency (DE), and reliability using Kuder-Richardson 20 coefficients (KR20). Pre-test and post-test scores of study participants were compared. Effectiveness of workshop was determined using class average normalized gain. Result: The 14 item one-best questions had acceptable difficulty level (60.35 ± 9.46%) and ideal discriminating power (0.75 ± 0.17) with mean DE 73.81 ± 22.46%. The test was found highly reliable with KR20 as 0.90. Mean score in pre-test and post-test were 6.47 ± 3.38 and 13.69 ± 1.51, respectively, and significant improvement in post-test score was found compared to pre-test score. Class average normalized gain was 0.84. Conclusion: The Occupational health hazards and vaccination workshop effectively improved healthcare providers' knowledge regarding workplace safety protocols. Questionnaire was found to be valid and reliable. Low baseline knowledge highlights the fact that implementation of such training on regular basis is the need of hour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.