Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36387500›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

A massive open online course to teach undergraduate medical students in oncology: keys of success.

Diaddin Hamdan, Frédéric Pamoukdjian, Jaqueline Lehmann-Che, Cédric de Bazelaire, Laetitia Vercellino, Julien Calvani, Maxime Battistella, Philippe Bertheau, Géraldine Falgarone, Guilhem Bousquet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact of Practical Online Lessons on Chinese Medical Students' Perception of Radiation Oncology.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diaddin HamdanUniversité de Paris, INSERM, U942 MASCOT, F-75006, Paris, France.
Frédéric PamoukdjianUniversité de Paris, INSERM, U942 MASCOT, F-75006, Paris, France.
Jaqueline Lehmann-CheUniversité de Paris, INSERM, U976, F-75006, Paris, France.
Cédric de BazelaireUniversité de Paris, INSERM, U976, F-75006, Paris, France.
Laetitia VercellinoUniversité de Paris, INSERM, U942 MASCOT, F-75006, Paris, France.
Julien CalvaniUniversité de Paris, INSERM, U976, F-75006, Paris, France.
Maxime BattistellaUniversité de Paris, INSERM, U976, F-75006, Paris, France.
Philippe BertheauUniversité de Paris, INSERM, U976, F-75006, Paris, France.
Géraldine FalgaroneUniversité de Paris, INSERM, U942 MASCOT, F-75006, Paris, France.
Guilhem BousquetUniversité de Paris, INSERM, U942 MASCOT, F-75006, Paris, France.
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are gaining popularity in education while classroom lectures are being deserted, especially after COVID-19 pandemic. Their added value in teaching undergraduate medical students remains to be confirmed. This study evaluated a MOOC devoted to undergraduate medical students in a blended oncology-teaching university program. It was the first to target undergraduate medical students in oncology at its beginning. Students were asked to participate in a survey before and after MOOC to explore interactions between their characteristics and final grades, 65% of the participating students belonged to the rich class. 70% of the students completed the MOOC. Grades distributions were similar before and after MOOC implementation, so MOOC doesn't alter overall results. In addition, there was a positive effect of the MOOC on median grades on the immediate test. The univariate and multivariate analysis showed that socioeconomic status and student's willingness to participate interacted significantly with final results. Particularly, students' motivation and satisfaction were associated with better results; Almost 70% of students asked for blended learning. E-learning is reliable to teach oncology to undergraduate medical students. The success is directly linked to students' willingness to participate, and can be improved using blended methods including tutorials.

Indexed as

Medical undergraduatesMOOCOncologyStudent perceptionSuccess factors

Identifiers

PMID36387500
PMCPMC9647199
OpenAlexW4307956706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.