ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2022
Real-world pharmacological treatment of patients with postpartum depression in China from 2016 to 2020: A cross-sectional analysis.
Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current status and trends of anti-tumor biosimilars in China from 2019 to 2023: A cross-sectional analysis.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025Article
- Molecular Biomarker Identification Using a Network-Based Bioinformatics Approach That Links COVID-19 With Smoking.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the use and tendency of drugs for postpartum depression (PPD) in nine cities across China in 2016-2020 in order to provide a reference for drug use in the clinic. Methods: The prescription data of drugs for PPD outpatients in nine cities (Beijing, Chengdu, Guangzhou, Harbin, Hangzhou, Shanghai, Shenyang, Tianjin and Zhengzhou) across China in 2016-2020 were extracted from the Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperation Project database of the Hospital Pharmacy Professional Committee of Chinese Pharmaceutical Association. A cross-sectional analysis was then conducted of patient age, total prescription quantity, average prescription amount, defined daily doses (DDDs) of drugs, defined daily cost (DDC) of drugs and so on. Results: In 2016-2020, more than half of PPD patients in these nine cities were distributed in first-tier cities (Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou), and were mainly aged 30-39 years. During the five-year period, the prescription quantity, total prescription amount and average prescription amount increased by 20.95%, 35.41% and 11.02%, respectively. In terms of prescription frequency and prescription amount, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) ranked first, followed by serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). With regard to DDDs, escitalopram, sertraline, paroxetine and venlafaxine ranked high, and sertraline was top year by year. The DDC of vortioxetine and milnacipran was greatest, while that of escitalopram, olanzapine and quetiapine declined sharply after being included in the China centralized drug-procurement program. Conclusion: The number of PPD patients and the total prescription amount in the nine cities across China increased in 2016-2020. SSRIs and SNRIs were the main drugs for PPD treatment. Due to the national centralized drug-procurement policy, there has been a great reduction in the DDC, lightening the economic burden on patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.