Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36387282›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Interpretable machine learning methods for predictions in systems biology from omics data.

David Sidak, Jana Schwarzerová, Wolfram Weckwerth, Steffen Waldherr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Network propagation in bipartite metabolite-reaction graphs for metabolomic data exploration.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Modeling the Interactions Between Chemicals and Proteins to Predict the Health Consequences of Air Pollution.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Analyzing Atomic Interactions in Molecules as Learned by Neural Networks.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David SidakDepartment of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Molecular Systems Biology (MOSYS), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jana SchwarzerováDepartment of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Molecular Systems Biology (MOSYS), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfram WeckwerthDepartment of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Molecular Systems Biology (MOSYS), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Steffen WaldherrDepartment of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Molecular Systems Biology (MOSYS), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning has become a powerful tool for systems biologists, from diagnosing cancer to optimizing kinetic models and predicting the state, growth dynamics, or type of a cell. Potential predictions from complex biological data sets obtained by "omics" experiments seem endless, but are often not the main objective of biological research. Often we want to understand the molecular mechanisms of a disease to develop new therapies, or we need to justify a crucial decision that is derived from a prediction. In order to gain such knowledge from data, machine learning models need to be extended. A recent trend to achieve this is to design "interpretable" models. However, the notions around interpretability are sometimes ambiguous, and a universal recipe for building well-interpretable models is missing. With this work, we want to familiarize systems biologists with the concept of model interpretability in machine learning. We consider data sets, data preparation, machine learning methods, and software tools relevant to omics research in systems biology. Finally, we try to answer the question: "What is interpretability?" We introduce views from the interpretable machine learning community and propose a scheme for categorizing studies on omics data. We then apply these tools to review and categorize recent studies where predictive machine learning models have been constructed from non-sequential omics data.

Indexed as

deep learningexplainable artificial intelligenceinterpretable machine learningmetabolomicsmulti-omicsproteomicstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID36387282
PMCPMC9650551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.