ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
A prognostic signature model for unveiling tumor progression in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gefitinib metabolism-related lncRNAs for the prediction of prognosis, tumor microenvironment and drug sensitivity in lung adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Unraveling the tumor immune microenvironment of lung adenocarcinoma using single-cell RNA sequencing.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- A Deep Learning Approach for Prognostic Evaluation of Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on Cuproptosis-Related Genes.Biomedicines · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A more accurate prognosis is important for clinical treatment of lung adenocarcinoma. However, due to the limitation of sample and technical bias, most prognostic signatures lacked reproducibility, and few were applied to clinical practice. In addition, understanding the molecular driving mechanism is indispensable for developing more promising therapies for lung adenocarcinoma. Here, we built an unbiased prognostic significance model to perform an integrative analysis, including differentially expressed genes and clinical data with lung adenocarcinoma patients from TCGA. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model with the Lasso penalty and 10-fold cross-validate were used to identify the best gene signature. We generated a 17-gene signature for prognostic risk prediction based on the overall survival time of lung adenocarcinoma patients. To further test the model's predictive ability, we have applied an independent GEO database to verify the predictive ability of prognostic signature. The model can more objectively describe several biological processes related to tumors and reveal important molecular mechanisms in tumor development by GO and KEGG analysis. Furthermore, differential expression analysis by GSEA revealed that tumor microenvironments such as ER stress, exosome, and immune microenvironment were enriched. Using single-cell RNA sequence technology, we found that risk score was positively correlated with lung adenocarcinoma marker genes and copy number variation but negatively correlated with lung epithelial marker genes. High-risk cell populations with the model had stronger cancer stemness and tumor-related pathway activation. As we expected, the risk score was in accordance with the malignancy of each cluster from tumor progression. In conclusion, the risking model established in this study is more reliable than others in evaluating the prognosis of LUAD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.