ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
DUSP1 promotes muscle atrophy by inhibiting myocyte differentiation in cachectic patients.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Skeletal muscle atrophy is the major hallmark of cancer cachexia. The mechanisms underlying muscle wasting remain elusive in cachectic patients. Our research seeks to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between non-cachectic and cachectic cancer patients and elucidate their functions. Methods: We screened the DEGs of skeletal muscle between patients with and without cachexia from microarray data. Biological function of DEGs is analyzed through gene enrichment analysis, while an interaction network is constructed to visualize how genes are related. A Spearman's correlation analysis demonstrated the clinical significance of DUSP1 related to cancer cachexia. Skeletal muscle samples were collected and histomorphology studies were conducted. Function of DUSP1 on myogenesis was clarified by qPCR, western blotting, and immunofluorescence. Results: We screened 324 DEGs in skeletal muscle from patients with and without cachexia. The results of the gene enrichment analysis indicated that inflammatory cytokines and immune responses contribute significantly to the pathological condition of cachexia. DUSP1 was one of the key genes in the regulating network. DUSP1 protein and mRNA levels were increased significantly in skeletal muscle tissues from patients with cancer cachexia. DUSP1 expression in cachectic group was found to have negative correlation with SMA, prealbumin and BMI and positive correlation with TNFα, IL6 and weight loss. Significant changes of myogenesis related genes were observed in myocyte after DUSP1 was overexpressed and knocked down. Conclusion: In skeletal muscle of cachectic patients, DUSP1 expression was observed to be higher and thus DUSP1 promote muscle atrophy by inhibiting myogenesis. DUSP1 is expected to be a specific target in cancer cachexia for preventing and treating muscle atrophy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.