ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Single ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block with a large volume of anesthetic for microwave ablation of lung tumors.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Safety and efficacy of co-ablationJournal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Comparison of injectate spread following transverse vs. sagittalFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare single ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) using a large volume of anesthetic with local anesthesia (LA) in computed tomography (CT)-guided pulmonary microwave ablation. Subjects and methods: Eighty patients who underwent CT-guided microwave ablation of pulmonary tumors were randomly divided into the TPVB group and the LA group. Patients of the TPVB group were anesthetized with a single injection of a large volume (40 ml) of 0.375% ropivacaine injection at T4, and those of the LA group had local infiltration by the surgeon at the puncture site, and emergency rescue with propofol injection was administered when the patient could not tolerate pain in either group. The following variables were recorded in both groups: general conditions; volume of propofol injection for emergency rescue during ablation; visual analog scale (VAS) scores during ablation and at 0, 2, 12, and 24 h after ablation; the need to use analgesics for rescue within 24 h after ablation; number of ablations; number of punctures performed by the surgeon; patient's movements during puncturing; and puncturing-associated complications. Results: Compared with the TPVB group, the amount of emergency use of propofol injection was significantly more in the LA group ( Conclusion: Single ultrasound-guided TPVB with a large volume of anesthetic offers effective analgesia for microwave ablation of lung tumors, helping the patient cooperate with the operating surgeon to reduce injury from multiple lung punctures. Further studies are recommended to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.