ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022
MET-targeted therapies for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The safety and efficacy of binimetinib for lung cancer: a systematic review.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Research progress on resistance and mechanisms of c-Met inhibitors in treatingJournal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- TargetingTranslational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Non-small cell lung cancer research: advances and persistent challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Mitigation and management of adverse events associated with amivantamab therapy.The oncologist · 2025Review
- Treatment of advanced‑stage non‑small cell lung cancer: Current progress and a glimpse into the future (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- A novel mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) inhibitor, CB538, relieves acquired resistance inTranslational cancer research · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Advances in Molecular Mechanisms and Targeted Therapies for the Specific Type of Cystic Lung Cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2025Review
- [Savolitinib Induced Pathological Complete Response in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with MET Amplification: A Case Report].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024Article
- Amivantamab, the first epidermal growth factor receptor and mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor inhibitor, associated with penile and inguinal ulcers and paronychia.JAAD case reports · 2024Article
- Savolitinib: A Promising Targeting Agent for Cancer.Cancers · 2023Review
- Real-World Experience in Treatment of Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with BRAF or cMET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dysregulation of the mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) pathway contributes to poor clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Numerous clinical trials are currently investigating several therapies based on modulation of the MET pathway. Objectives: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the activity and safety of MET inhibitors in patients with NSCLC. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 02, 2022. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were extracted as the main outcomes and pooled using the weighted mean proportion with fixed- or random-effects models in cases of significant heterogeneity ( Results: Eleven studies (882 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled ORR was 28.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.223-0.354), while the pooled DCR was 69.1% (95% CI, 0.631-0.756). ORRs were higher for tepotinib (44.7% [95% CI, 0.365-0.530]) and savolitinib (42.9% [95% CI, 0.311-0.553]) than for other types of MET inhibitors. Patients with NSCLC with exon 14 skipping exhibited higher ORRs (39.3% (95% CI, 0.296-0.522)) and DCRs (77.8% (95% CI, 0.714-0.847)) than those with MET protein overexpression or amplification. Intracranial response rate and intracranial disease control rates were 40.1% (95% CI, 0.289-0.556) and 95.4% (95% CI, 0.892-0.100), respectively. Adverse events were mild (grade 1 to 2) in 87.2% of patients. Common adverse events above grade 3 included lower extremity edema (3.5% [95% CI, 0.027-0.044]), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation (2.4% [95% CI, 0.014-0.033]), and lipase elevation (2.2% [95% CI, 0.016-0.031]). Conclusion: MET inhibitors, which exhibited a satisfactory safety profile in the current study, may become a new standard of care for addressing MET dysregulation in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, and even in those with brain metastases, particularly tepotinib, savolitinib and capmatinib. Further randomized trials are required to establish standard predictive biomarkers for MET therapies and to compare the effects of different MET inhibitors in NSCLC with MET dysregulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.