Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36387082›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Surgical options of the breast and clinical outcomes of breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A single-center retrospective study.

Yuting Sang, Xujie Zhou, Weiru Chi, Jiajian Chen, Benlong Yang, Shuang Hao, Xiaoyan Huang, Guangyu Liu, Zhimin Shao, Jiong Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuting SangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xujie ZhouDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Weiru ChiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiajian ChenDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Benlong YangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shuang HaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoyan HuangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Guangyu LiuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhimin ShaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiong WuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has evolved significantly and has been widely accepted for downstaging disease in early-stage and locally advanced breast cancer patients. Since the optimal surgical intervention for patients receiving NAC remains controversial, we aim to investigate the survival outcome of patients treated with different surgical management. Methods: A retrospective, nested case-control study was conducted in patients with invasive breast cancer that underwent NAC at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from January 2010 to June 2019. Based on surgical intervention, patients were divided into mastectomy and breast conservation groups. Patients were matched on age at diagnosis, menopausal status, the year of the surgery, post neoadjuvant therapy pathological tumor (ypT) stage, post neoadjuvant therapy pathological node (ypN) stage, molecular subtypes, and axillary surgery by propensity score matching. Results: A total of 2080 patients were enrolled in this study. Among them, 1819 (87.5%) patients were categorized as mastectomy group, and 261 (12.5%) patients were classed as breast conservation group. Over 9-years of research, the proportion of breast conservation steadily increased in patients after NAC. Data showed that younger (P<0.001) and pre-menopausal (P<0.001) patients with normal BMI (P=0.022) were more likely to receive breast conservation. Patients at advanced ypT stage (P<0.001), ypN stage (P<0.001), and clinical TNM stage (P<0.001) were more often to undergo mastectomy, while breast conservation rate was significantly higher in patients with triple-negative tumors (P=0.023). Compared with the mastectomy group, significant benefits in overall survival were observed in patients who received breast conservation (Hazard ratio 0.41, [95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.97]; p=0.049) in the matched cohort. There was no statistical difference between groups related to disease-free survival and locoregional recurrence. Conclusions: Tumor biology can significantly impact the surgical decision in patients administrated with NAC. Breast conservation was a safe alternative for mastectomy in the NAC setting without compromising survival outcomes and locoregional control.

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast conservationmastectomyneoadjuvant chemotherapyoncoplastic surgerysurgery

Identifiers

PMID36387082
PMCPMC9647014
OpenAlexW4307634432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.