Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36387078›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Patterns and predictors of recurrence after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer.

Hong Yang, Lei Chen, Xiuxiu Wu, Chenghai Zhang, Zhendan Yao, Jiadi Xing, Ming Cui, Beihai Jiang, Xiangqian Su

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hong YangKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Lei ChenKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiuxiu WuKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Chenghai ZhangKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Zhendan YaoKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Jiadi XingKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Ming CuiKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Beihai JiangKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiangqian SuKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Peking University Cancer Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the patterns and predictors of recurrence in patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer. Methods: Patients with rectal cancer receiving laparoscopic resection between April 2009 and March 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The association of recurrence with clinicopathological characteristics was evaluated using multivariate analyses. Results: A total of 405 consecutive patients were included in our study. Within a median follow-up time of 62 months, 77 patients (19.0%) experienced disease recurrence: 10 (2.5%) had locoregional recurrence (LR), 61 (15.1%) had distant metastasis (DM), and 6 (1.5%) developed LR and DM synchronously. The lung was the most common site of metastasis. Multivariate analyses indicated that involved circumferential resection margin (CRM) was the only independent predictor for LR (OR=13.708, 95% CI 3.478-54.026, P<0.001), whereas elevated baseline level of CA19-9 (OR=3.299, 95% CI 1.461-7.449, P=0.032), advanced pN stage (OR=2.292, 95% CI 1.177-4.462, P=0.015) and harvested lymph nodes less than 12 (OR=2.418, 95% CI 1.245-4.695, P=0.009) were independently associated with DM. Patients receiving salvage surgery showed superior 3-year survival compared with palliative treatment after relapse (90.9% vs. 20.5%; P=0.017). The estimated 5-year DFS and CSS for the entire cohort was 80.2% and 83.1%, respectively. Conclusions: DM was more common than LR after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer, and there were several clinicopathological factors related to LR and DM. Involved CRM and suboptimal lymph node yield were adverse surgery-related factors of tumor recurrence, which should be paid more attention to during the operation.

Indexed as

distant metastasislaparoscopic surgerylocoregional recurrencerectal cancersalvage surgery

Identifiers

PMID36387078
PMCPMC9647165
OpenAlexW4307633877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.