Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36387069›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Can a proposed double branch multimodality-contribution-aware TripNet improve the prediction performance of the microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma based on small samples?

Yuhui Deng, Xibin Jia, Gaoyuan Yu, Jian Hou, Hui Xu, Ahong Ren, Zhenchang Wang, Dawei Yang, Zhenghan Yang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuhui DengDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xibin JiaFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Gaoyuan YuFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Jian HouDepartment of Radiology, The People's Hospital of Jimo.Qingdao, Qingdao, China.
Hui XuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ahong RenDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhenchang WangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Dawei YangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhenghan YangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the potential improvement of prediction performance of a proposed double branch multimodality-contribution-aware TripNet (MCAT) in microvascular invasion (MVI) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on a small sample. Methods: In this retrospective study, 121 HCCs from 103 consecutive patients were included, with 44 MVI positive and 77 MVI negative, respectively. A MCAT model aiming to improve the accuracy of deep neural network and alleviate the negative effect of small sample size was proposed and the improvement of MCAT model was verified among comparisons between MCAT and other used deep neural networks including 2DCNN (two-dimentional convolutional neural network), ResNet (residual neural network) and SENet (squeeze-and-excitation network), respectively. Results: Through validation, the AUC value of MCAT is significantly higher than 2DCNN based on CT, MRI, and both imaging (P < 0.001 for all). The AUC value of model with single branch pretraining based on small samples is significantly higher than model with end-to-end training in CT branch and double branch (0.62 vs 0.69, p=0.016, 0.65 vs 0.83, p=0.010, respectively). The AUC value of the double branch MCAT based on both CT and MRI imaging (0.83) was significantly higher than that of the CT branch MCAT (0.69) and MRI branch MCAT (0.73) (P < 0.001, P = 0.03, respectively), which was also significantly higher than common-used ReNet (0.67) and SENet (0.70) model (P < 0.001, P = 0.005, respectively). Conclusion: A proposed Double branch MCAT model based on a small sample can improve the effectiveness in comparison to other deep neural networks or single branch MCAT model, providing a potential solution for scenarios such as small-sample deep learning and fusion of multiple imaging modalities.

Indexed as

CTdeep learninghepatocellular carcinomamicrovascular invasionMRI

Identifiers

PMID36387069
PMCPMC9640917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.