Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36386815›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Diagnostic accuracy of circulating free DNA testing for the detection of KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maria Palmieri, Elisabetta Zulato, Sissel Gyrid Freim Wahl, Nicolas Guibert, Elisa Frullanti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for identifying actionable mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Detection ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria PalmieriMed Biotech Hub and Competence Center, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Elisabetta ZulatoBasic and Translational Oncology Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Sissel Gyrid Freim WahlDepartment of Pathology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Nicolas GuibertThoracic Oncology Department, Larrey Hospital, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Elisa FrullantiMed Biotech Hub and Competence Center, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
University of Siena · ITInserm · FRIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) gene encodes a GTPase that acts as a molecular switch for intracellular signal transduction, promoting cell growth and proliferation. Mutations in the KRAS gene represent important biomarkers for NSCLC targeted therapy. However, detection of KRAS mutations in tissues has shown some limitations. During the last years, analyses of circulating free DNA (cfDNA) has emerged as an alternative and minimally invasive, approach to investigate tumor molecular changes. Here, we assessed the diagnostic performance of cfDNA analysis, compared to tissues through a meta-analysis and systematic review of existing literature. From 561 candidate papers, we finally identified 40 studies, including 2,805 NSCLC patients. We extracted values relating to the number of true-positive, false-positive, false-negative, and true-negative. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio, each with 95% CI, were calculated. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the overall diagnostic performance. The pooled sensitivity was 0.71 (95% CI 0.68-0.74) and the specificity was 0.93 (95% CI 0.92-0.94). The diagnostic odds ratio was 35.24 (95% CI 24.88-49.91) and the area under the curve was 0.92 (SE = 0.094). These results provide evidence that detection of KRAS mutation using cfDNA testing is of adequate diagnostic accuracy thus offering to the clinicians a new promising screening test for NSCLC patients.

Indexed as

cancer riskdiagnostic valuegenetic biomarkersliquid biopsysingle-nucleotide polymorphisms

Identifiers

PMID36386815
PMCPMC9640997
OpenAlexW4307372499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.