Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36386761›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2022

Evaluation of clinical applicability of automated liver parenchyma segmentation of multi-center magnetic resonance images.

Varatharajan Nainamalai, Pravda Jith Ray Prasad, Egidijus Pelanis, Bjørn Edwin, Fritz Albregtsen, Ole Jakob Elle, Rahul P Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. CustomizedHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Varatharajan NainamalaiThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
Pravda Jith Ray PrasadThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
Egidijus PelanisThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn EdwinThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
Fritz AlbregtsenDepartment of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ole Jakob ElleThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
Rahul P KumarThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Automated algorithms for liver parenchyma segmentation can be used to create patient-specific models (PSM) that assist clinicians in surgery planning. In this work, we analyze the clinical applicability of automated deep learning methods together with level set post-processing for liver segmentation in contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance images. Methods: UNet variants with/without attention gate, multiple loss functions, and level set post-processing were used in the workflow. A multi-center, multi-vendor dataset from Oslo laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis clinical trial is used in our study. The dataset of 150 volumes is divided as 81:25:25:19 corresponding to train:validation:test:clinical evaluation respectively. We evaluate the clinical use, time to edit automated segmentation, tumor regions, boundary leakage, and over-and-under segmentations of predictions. Results: The deep learning algorithm shows a mean Dice score of 0.9696 in liver segmentation, and we also examined the potential of post-processing to improve the PSMs. The time to create clinical use segmentations of level set post-processed predictions shows a median time of 16 min which is 2 min less than deep learning inferences. The intra-observer variations between manually corrected deep learning and level set post-processed segmentations show a 3% variation in the Dice score. The clinical evaluation shows that 7 out of 19 cases of both deep learning and level set post-processed segmentations contain all required anatomy and pathology, and hence these results could be used without any manual corrections. Conclusions: The level set post-processing reduces the time to create clinical standard segmentations, and over-and-under segmentations to a certain extent. The time advantage greatly supports clinicians to spend their valuable time with patients.

Indexed as

Clinical applicabilityDeep learningLevel setLiver parenchymaMagnetic resonance imagesSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID36386761
PMCPMC9640352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.