ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022
The impact of genetic modified Ma bamboo on soil microbiome.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluating the potential alteration of microbial communities is a vital step for biosafety of genetic modified plants. Recently, we have produced genetic modified Ma bamboo with increased cold and drought tolerance by anthocyanin accumulation. In this work, we aim to study the potential effects on microbial communities in rhizosphere soils during the cultivation of genetic modified bamboo. Rhizosphere and surrounding soil were collected at 3-month post-transplant. The amplicon (16S rDNA and ITS1) were sequenced for analysis of bacterial and fungal communities. Multiple software and database (Picrust2, FAPROTAX and FUNGulid) were applied to predict and compare the microbial functions involving basic metabolisms, nitrogen usage and presence of plant pathogens. There were no substantial change of the structure and abundance of rhizosphere soil microbial communities between genetic modified and wild type bamboo. For the surrounding soil, the bacterial biota α-diversity increased (chao1: 1,001 ± 80-1,276 ± 84, observed species: 787 ± 52-1,194 ± 137, PD whole tree: 75 ± 4-117 ± 18) and fungal biota α-diversity decreased (chao1: 187 ± 18-145 ± 10) in samples of genetic modified bamboo compared to those of wild type bamboo. The microbiota predicted functions did not change or had no negative alteration between genetic modified and wild type bamboo, in both rhizosphere and surrounding soils. As a conclusion, the growth of genetic modified bamboo had no substantial change on rhizosphere soil microbial communities, while minor alteration on bamboo surrounding soil microbial communities with no harmful effects. Moreover, the genetic modified bamboo had no negative effect on the predicted functions of microbiota in soil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.