Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36386541›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Development and validation of a nomogram for patients with stage II/III gastric adenocarcinoma after radical surgery.

Lei Wang, Huiqiong Han, Liwen Feng, Yanru Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lei WangDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Huiqiong HanDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Liwen FengDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yanru QinDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We aimed to construct nomograms based on clinicopathological features and routine preoperative hematological indices to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage II/III gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) after radical resection. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 468 patients with stage II/III GA after curative gastrectomy between 2012 and 2018; 70% of the patients were randomly assigned to the training set ( Results: Multivariate Cox model identified depth of invasion, lymph node invasion, tumor differentiation, adjuvant chemotherapy, CA724, and platelet-albumin ratio as covariates associated with CSS and DFS. CA199 is a risk factor unique to CSS. The nomogram constructed using the results of the multivariate analysis showed high accuracy with a consistency index of 0.771 (CSS) and 0.771 (DFS). Moreover, the area under the curve values for the 3-and 5-year CSS were 0.868 and 0.918, and the corresponding values for DFS were 0.872 and 0.919, respectively. The nomogram had a greater clinical benefit than the TNM staging system. High-risk patients based on the nomogram had a worse prognosis than low-risk patients. Conclusion: The prognostic nomogram for patients with stage II/III GA after radical gastrectomy established in this study has a good predictive ability, which is helpful for doctors to accurately evaluate the prognosis of patients to make more reasonable treatment plans.

Indexed as

decision curve analysisgastric adenocarcinomanomogramplateletalbumin ratioprognosissurvival

Identifiers

PMID36386541
PMCPMC9659722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.