ReviewFrontiers in surgery2022
Progress in screening strategies for neonatal developmental dysplasia of the hip.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence to Detect Developmental Dysplasia of Hip: A Systematic Review.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025Pooled it
- Female-Inclusive Selective Versus Universal Neonatal Hip Ultrasonography Screening for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Clinical Predictors and the Impact of a Screening Protocol.Cureus · 2026Article
- A retrospective study on isolated acetabular edge blunting in infants: clinical significance and proposed follow-up protocol.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Ultrasonography and the Reorientation of Developmental Hip Dysplasia Research: An NLP-NMF Trend Analysis (1980-2024).The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Mid-term outcomes of modified colonna capsular arthroplasty in adolescent and young adult patient with unilateral hip dysplasia dislocation.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Lower Limb Inter-Joint Coordination and End-Point Control During Gait in Adolescents with Early Treated Unilateral Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessing Femoral Head Medialization in Developmental Hip Dysplasia Type 1 and Type 2 Hip Separation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Treatment of developmental hip dysplasia with manual therapy following Pavlik harness failure: a case report with long-term follow-up.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2024Article
- Article
- Length of treatment and ultrasound timing in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Are the outcomes of single-stage open reduction and Dega osteotomy the same when treating DDH in patients younger than 8 years old? A prospective cohort study.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023Article
- Assessment for late developmental hip dysplasia in a cohort of infants with risk factors and normal hip ultrasound.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants younger than six months: Ultrasonographic assessment in relation with risk factors.International journal of health sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common congenital disease of the musculoskeletal system in newborns and encompasses a disease spectrum ranging from a stable hip with a mildly dysplastic acetabulum to complete hip dislocation. Systematic screening for infant DDH has been performed for several decades all over the world and has contributed greatly to the early detection, diagnosis and treatment of DDH. However, some cases of delayed diagnosis still occur among the screened population, or conversely, overdiagnosis or overtreatment occasionally occurs. Furthermore, screening strategies for DDH are still controversial. The aim of our study was to analyze the current literature on DDH screening, paying particular attention to DDH screening strategies and their effectiveness. We searched the DDH screening literature from 1958 to 2021 in MEDLINE and other databases using PubMed. In this study, we reviewed the history of DDH screening and the progress of screening strategies and discussed the controversies regarding clinical and ultrasound screening methods with particular emphasis on the current opinions. Given the existing scientific evidence and changes in newborn DDH screening practices, universal ultrasound screening seems to be the best option for preventing late-detected cases and can be recommended as a favorable prevention strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.