Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36386500›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Comparison of laparoscopic and open approach in the treatment of heterotopic pregnancy following embryo transfer.

Shengfu Chen, Yingying Zhu, Meiqing Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shengfu ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yingying ZhuClinical Research Design Division, Clinical Research Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Meiqing XieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Heterotopic pregnancy (HP) is a rare disease with the coexistence of an intrauterine and ectopic embryos. There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of HP at present. This research aimed to compare the perioperative and pregnancy outcomes of laparoscopic (LA) and open approach (OA) in patients with HP after embryo transfer. Methods: Women with HP receiving surgical treatment (LA or OA) were retrospectively recruited in this study between October 2006 and December 2020. The demographic, perioperative and obstetric data were collected and compared between LA and OA group. Results: Totally, 86 patients were included in this study. Among these patients, 62 underwent LA and 24 underwent OA. There was an increase in the adoption of LA between the 2006-2012 period and the 2013-2020 period [25% (6/24) vs. 90% (56/62), Conclusions: Compared with open approach, laparoscopy was shown to provide a comparable pregnancy outcomes and a better performance on perioperative outcomes in the treatment of HP patients with embryo transfer.

Indexed as

heterotopic pregnancylaparoscopyopen surgeryperioperative outcomepregnancy outcome

Identifiers

PMID36386500
PMCPMC9663481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.