Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36386457›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2022

FDG PET and CT radiomics in diagnosis and prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Pascal Hannequin, Chantal Decroisette, Pascale Kermanach, Giulia Berardi, Vincent Bourbonne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tumor Characterization Using [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prognostic nomogram combiningScientific reports · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Radiomics based onFrontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
  15. What is the real value of predictive models?Translational lung cancer research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pascal HannequinAnnecy Nuclear Medicine Center, Le Pericles, B Allée de la Mandallaz, Metz-Tessy, France.
Chantal DecroisettePneumology Department, CHANGE Annecy, 1 Avenue de l'hôpital, Metz-Tessy, France.
Pascale KermanachMont Blanc Histo-Pathology Laboratory, 40 Route de l'Aiglière, Argonay, France.
Giulia BerardiPneumology Department, University Hospital la Tronche, Boulevard de la Chantourne, La Tronche, France.
Vincent BourbonneRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 2 Avenue Foch, Brest, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: Our patients were retrospectively considered. They all had a FDG PET-CT and immuno-histo-chemistry (IHC) to assess PD-L1 expression at the beginning of the disease. A prognosis univariate and multivariate Cox survival analyses was performed for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) prediction, including a training/testing procedure. Two sets of 47 PET and 47 CT radiomics features (RFs) were extracted. Difference between RFs according to PD-L1 expression, the histology status and the stage level were tested using suited non parametric statistical tests and the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and the area under curve (AUC). Results: From 2017 to 2019, 212 NSCLC patients treated in our institution were included. The main conventional prognostic variables were stage and gender with a low added prognostic value in the models including PET and CT RFs. Neither PET nor CT RFs were significant to separate the different levels of PD-L1 expression. Several RFs differ between adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) tumours and a large number of PET and CT RFs are significantly linked to patient stage. Conclusions: In our population, PET and CT RFs show their intrinsic power to predict survival but do not significantly improve OS and PFS prediction in the different multivariate models, in comparison to conventional data. It would seem necessary to carry out one's own survival analysis before determining a radiomics signature.

Indexed as

18FDG PET-CTlung neoplasmsPD-L1prognosisradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36386457
PMCPMC9641045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.