Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36386435›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2022

Clinical, logistic, and geographic factors in ensuring adequate access to implant removals: A cross-sectional survey of public facilities and GIS modeling of geographic access in two districts of Senegal.

Aurélie Brunie, Caleb Parker, Salif Ndiaye, Fatou Ndiaté Rachel Sarr Aw, Emily B Keyes, Elena Lebetkin, Etienne Dioh, James MacCarthy, Marème Mady Dia Ndiaye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Aurélie BrunieGlobal Health and Population Research Department, FHI 360, Washington, DC, United States.
Caleb ParkerData and Analytics Department, FHI 360, Durham, NC, United States.
Salif NdiayeCentre de Recherche pour le Développement Humain (CRDH), Dakar, Senegal.
Fatou Ndiaté Rachel Sarr AwIntraHealth International, Dakar, Senegal.
Emily B KeyesCommunity and Health Systems Department, FHI 360, Durham, NC, United States.
Elena LebetkinProduct Development and Introduction Department, FHI 360, Durham, NC, United States.
Etienne DiohIntraHealth International, Dakar, Senegal.
James MacCarthyGlobal Forest Watch Team, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, United States.
Marème Mady Dia NdiayeSénégal Ministère de la Santé et de l'Action Sociale, Direction de la Sante de la Mère et de l'Enfant, division Planification Familiale, Dakar, Senegal.
Family Health International 360 · USIntraHealth International · USInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · SNMinistère de la Santé Publique et Action Sociale · SNWorld Resources Institute · US

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-010614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ensuring adequate access to contraceptive implant removal services requires an understanding of potential clinical, logistical, and geographic challenges. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 39 public health facilities in two districts of Senegal. To assess facility readiness, we reported the proportion of facilities meeting all minimum conditions for regular and difficult implant removals. We then describe characteristics of referral networks. Geographic access modeling was conducted in a geographic information system to estimate the proportion of women of reproductive age living within specific travel times of facilities ready for regular and difficult removals. Results: 72% of facilities met all conditions for regular removals, and 8% for difficult removals. In both cases, the main gaps related to equipment availability (79% of facilities had the minimum equipment for regular removals and 8% for difficult removals). 72% of facilities organized in three referral networks sent clients to other facilities for cases they could not manage. Of 11 receiving or single-network facilities, seven were ready for regular removals and one for difficult removals. Altogether, 36% of women in Dakar Centre and 99% of women in Kolda lived within two hours of a facility that was equipped to handle regular removals, compared to 15% and 69%, respectively, for difficult removals. Conclusion: Data such as those provided in this assessment are important to provide a realistic picture of the state of readiness of the health system and its ability to meet the inevitable demand for implant removals. Referral networks should be considered as an emerging strategy to avail sufficient capacity at the systems level, including for managing difficult removals. However, careful thought should be given to the location of facilities that are ready to receive cases in order to target upgrades.

Indexed as

contraceptioncontraceptive implantlong-acting reversible contraception (LARC)readinessreferralsremovalsSenegalsub-Sahara Africa (SSA)

Identifiers

PMID36386435
PMCPMC9640762
OpenAlexW4307373243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.