ArticleInfection and drug resistance2022
Herpetic Keratitis Following Corneal Crosslinking for Keratoconus: A Case Series.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Herpes Simplex Keratitis Following Corneal Crosslinking for Keratoconus: A One-Year Case Series Follow-Up.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Herpes simplex keratitis: A brief clinical overview.World journal of virology · 2024Review
- Clinical strategies to prevent recurrence of Herpes simplex and Herpes zoster following ocular surgery: A comprehensive review with practical guidelines.Survey of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Corneal crosslinking is widely applied to enhance corneal biomechanical properties and delay the progression of keratoconus. The surgical procedure and application of ultraviolet A irradiation (UVA) during corneal crosslinking have been recognized to induce the reactivation of simplex herpes virus (HSV) but are rarely reported and poorly analyzed. Case Presentation: We report the first case series of herpetic keratitis in 4 keratoconus patients undertaking corneal crosslinking, who were all clinically diagnosed at routine follow-up visits 3 days to 1 month after the surgery. Different from the typical new onset of secondary herpetic keratitis that mainly presents with epithelial lesions and severe eye pain, these patients all presented with stromal infiltrates and were generally asymptomatic except for vision blurring in 2 patients. All patients responded well to antiviral therapy, topical steroids, and epithelial nourishment medication, leaving corneal macula or nebula at the last follow-up visit. Conclusion: Close follow-up is essential and the most effective way to diagnose herpetic keratitis after corneal crosslinking due to the lack of subjective symptoms. The prophylactic use of antiviral therapy on asymptomatic patients is controversial and should be evaluated based on long-term prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.