Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36386401›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2022

Drain fluid biomarkers for prediction and diagnosis of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula: A narrative review.

Nadya Rykina-Tameeva, Jaswinder S Samra, Sumit Sahni, Anubhav Mittal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Regulating Enzyme Activity via Microaggregates Mediated by Phase Separation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Diagnostic Accuracy of Lipase as Early Predictor of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Results from the LIPADRAIN study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadya Rykina-TameevaNorthern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards 2065, Australia.
Jaswinder S SamraNorthern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards 2065, Australia.
Sumit SahniNorthern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards 2065, Australia. sumit.sahni@sydney.edu.au.
Anubhav MittalNorthern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards 2065, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) has continued to compromise patient recovery post-pancreatectomy despite decades of research seeking to improve risk prediction and diagnosis. The current diagnostic criteria for CR-POPF requires elevated drain fluid amylase to present alongside POPF-related complications including infection, haemorrhage and organ failure. These worrying sequelae necessitate earlier and easily obtainable biomarkers capable of reflecting evolving CR-POPF. Drain fluid has recently emerged as a promising source of biomarkers as it is derived from the pancreas and hence, capable of reflecting its postoperative condition. The present review aims to summarise the current knowledge of CR-POPF drain fluid biomarkers and identify gaps in the field to invigorate future research in this critical area of clinical need. These findings may provide robust diagnostic alternatives for CR-POPF and hence, to clarify their clinical utility require further reports detailing their diagnostic and/or predictive accuracy.

Indexed as

BiomarkersClinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulaDiagnosisDrain fluidPrediction

Identifiers

PMID36386401
PMCPMC9640330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.