Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36386372›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Shexiang Baoxin Pill (MUSKARDIA) reduces major adverse cardiovascular events in women with stable coronary artery disease: A subgroup analysis of a phase IV randomized clinical trial.

Haiming Shi, Jingmin Zhou, Changsheng Ma, Fusui Ji, Yang Wu, Yulan Zhao, Jun Qian, Xiaolong Wang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01897805 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-centered, Placebo-controlled Trial to Examine Effects of Heart-protecting Musk Pill on Clinical Outcome in Patients With Chronic Stable Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01897805 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-centered, Placebo-controlled Trial to Examine Effects of Heart-protecting Musk Pill on Clinical Outcome in Patients With Chronic Stable Coronary Artery Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Hutchison Pharmaceuticals LimitedRan2011 to 2015Enrolled2,700ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsHeart-protecting Musk Pill, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Haiming ShiDepartment of Cardiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jingmin ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Changsheng MaDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fusui JiDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Hospital of the Ministry of Health, Beijing, China.
Yang WuDepartment of Cardiology, Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yulan ZhaoDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jun QianDepartment of Cardiology, The Center Hospital of Ma'anshan, Ma'anshan, China.
Xiaolong WangDepartment of Cardiovascular, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Anshan Hospital · CNBeijing Anzhen Hospital · CNBeijing Hospital · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNFudan University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNShuguang Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A previous phase IV trial revealed sex as a potential effect modifier of MUSKARDIA efficacy in stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Objective: To assess the clinical effect of MUSKARDIA as a supplemental treatment to optimal medical therapy (OMT) in stable CAD cases. Methods: This study was a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase IV clinical study. Eligible individuals underwent randomization to the oral MUSKARDIA and placebo groups and were treated for 24 months. All participants received OMT according to existing guidelines. The primary composite outcome was the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), included cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or non-fatal stroke. The secondary composite outcome encompassed all-cause mortality, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina and/or heart failure, and undergoing coronary procedure/surgery during treatment. Safety signals, especially cardiovascular adverse events (AEs), were analyzed. Results: The female subgroup included 776 participants (384 and 392 in the MUSKARDIA and placebo groups, respectively). The occurrence of the primary composite outcome was lower in the MUSKARDIA group compared with placebo-treated individuals (HR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.09-0.83; Conclusion: As a supplemental treatment to OMT, 24-month administration of MUSKARDIA is effective and safe in female stable CAD cases. Clinical trial registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/], identifier [NCT01897805].

Indexed as

anginamajor adverse cardiovascular eventMUSKARDIAstable coronary artery diseasewomen

Identifiers

PMID36386372
PMCPMC9651060
OpenAlexW4307706944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.