Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36386266›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2022

Impact of sarcopenia in bladder preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients: a narrative review.

Hiroshi Fukushima, Fumitaka Koga

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroshi FukushimaDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumitaka KogaDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Medical and Dental University · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is a biologically aggressive disease and its prognosis is poor. Radical cystectomy (RC) with urinary diversion and lymph node dissection is the gold standard treatment for MIBC patients. Accumulating evidence indicates that sarcopenia, the degenerative and systemic loss of skeletal muscle mass, is a significant predictor of higher rates of mortality and perioperative complications following RC. Recently, bladder preservation therapy has been offered as an alternative in appropriately selected MIBC patients who desire to preserve their bladders and those unfit or unwilling for RC. Here, we performed a narrative review on the impact of sarcopenia on oncological outcomes and complication rates in MIBC patients treated with bladder preservation therapy. Methods: A literature review was performed using the PubMed and Scopus databases. Key Content and Findings: We identified two studies reported the impact of sarcopenia on responses to trimodal therapy and survival outcomes in MIBC patients. Consolidative partial cystectomy was performed in patients who achieved clinical complete response (CR) to trimodal therapy in one of the two studies. In both studies, CR rates to trimodal therapy are comparable between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients. Sarcopenia was not significantly associated with shorter survival after completing bladder preservation therapy in either study. For complication rates of bladder preservation therapy, one study showed equivalent complication rates of consolidative partial cystectomy between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients. In addition, in another small series of trimodal therapy, sarcopenic patients showed a higher rate of complications of trimodal therapy compared with non-sarcopenic patients. Conclusions: According to the result of our literature review, sarcopenia would not affect responses to trimodal therapy and prognosis in MIBC patients treated with bladder preservation therapy. Although the effect of sarcopenia on complication rates of bladder preservation therapy is inconclusive due to limited evidence, bladder preservation therapy could be a viable alternative option in carefully selected MIBC patients regardless of the presence of sarcopenia.

Indexed as

bladder preservation therapyfrailtymuscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC)Sarcopeniatrimodal therapy

Identifiers

PMID36386266
PMCPMC9641057
OpenAlexW4296523385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.